loghq vs Bugsnag
Bugsnag, now part of SmartBear, is polished stability monitoring with release health and stability targets baked into the product. It is closed source and primarily delivered as SaaS. If you want to own the data and run error tracking yourself on plain Postgres, loghq is the open alternative that covers the same capture-and-triage loop.
loghq and Bugsnag, side by side
Where Bugsnag still leads: its stability-score model and release-health targets are a mature, opinionated way to gate deploys. If that workflow is central to your team, it is well built.
Why teams pick loghq
Own your data
Bugsnag is hosted by default. loghq runs on your own Postgres, so error payloads and stack traces never leave your infrastructure.
Open source
You can read, audit, and extend loghq. A closed SaaS gives you the product as shipped and nothing underneath it.
Simple pricing
Event-plus-seat pricing adds up as the team grows. Self-hosted loghq is free, and the hosted tier bills on usage, not head count.
Credit where it is due
Bugsnag’s stability scores are a genuinely useful framing for release quality. loghq favors a simpler new-and-spiking model, so pick the one that matches how your team decides to ship.
What loghq is
Open-source error and crash tracking you can run on your own Postgres, or use on a hosted tier. Automatic capture, fingerprint grouping, source-mapped traces, releases, and alerts, without the rest of an observability suite.